Engine Power and Fuel Efficiency Comparison. For engine performance, the 2022 BMW Z4’s base engine makes 255 horsepower, and the 2022 Mazda MX-5 Miata base engine makes 181 horsepower. The Z4 is rated to deliver an average of 28 miles per gallon, with a highway range of 438 miles. The MX-5 Miata is rated to deliver an average of 29 miles per
Showing nationwide pricing. Enter your zip code to view local pricing. 2022 Mazda MX-5 Miata Club RWD CarGurus Instant Market Value $35,615 2002 BMW Z3 Roadster RWD CarGurus Instant Market Value $15,427 2022 Mazda MX-5 Miata Club RWD No Expert Reviews 2002 BMW Z3 Roadster RWD Fans of the BMW Z3 are likely to argue that the company's last version, produced in 2002, was its best. Six years of "consistent and conscientious development" and wider acceptance of ... 2022 Mazda MX-5 Miata Club RWD No User Reviews 2002 BMW Z3 Roadster RWD Jonathan writes: Fun, as manual a driver does not feel the thrill because of how much weight the car is. Seeing the hood is a n... Looks/Style Ranked 2001 Audi TT quattro Roadster AWD better. "I think the TT has a better look because of its retro style and go kart vibe." Would Buy Ranked 2001 Audi TT quattro Roadster AWD better. "I would buy an Audi TT instead because of the horsepower and interior feel." VWJett writes: Good driving car Front Seats Ranked 2006 Volkswagen Beetle Convertible worse. "Front seats were more better " Cargo Capacity Ranked 2006 Volkswagen Beetle Convertible better. "The VW Beetle has biggest trunk ever " 2022 Mazda MX-5 Miata Club RWD 2002 BMW Z3 Roadster RWD Powertrain 6-Speed Manual Drivetrain RWD RWD RWD Fuel Economy, City 26 MPG 17 MPG 18 MPG Fuel Economy, Highway 34 MPG 24 MPG 25 MPG Fuel Tank Volume gal 13 gal Engine Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline Gasoline Power 181 hp @ 7,000 RPM 184 hp @ 6,000 RPM 184 hp @ 6,000 RPM Torque 151 lb-ft @ 4,000 RPM 175 lb-ft @ 3,500 RPM 175 lb-ft @ 3,500 RPM Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders Compression Ratio 13:1 -- -- Displacement 2,000 cc 2,500 cc 2,500 cc Bore x Stroke in x in -- -- Safety ABS Brakes Standard Standard Driver Airbag Standard Standard Passenger Airbag Standard Standard Front Side Airbags Standard Standard NHTSA Crash Test Results Comfort and Convenience Leather Seats -- Optional Air Conditioning Standard Standard CD Player -- Standard CD Changer -- Optional Cassette Player -- Optional Radio Standard Standard Power Windows Standard Standard Power Door Locks Standard Standard Driver Power Seats -- Standard Passenger Power Seats -- Standard Interior Maximum Seating 2 seats 2 seats Front Legroom in in Back Legroom -- -- Payload and Towing Cargo Volume cu ft 5 cu ft Maximum Payload 404 lbs -- Exterior Length in in Width in in Height in in Wheelbase in in 2022 Mazda MX-5 Miata Club RWD Exterior Colors Deep Crystal Blue Mica Jet Black Mica Machine Gray Metallic POLYMETAL Gray Metallic Platinum Quartz Metallic Snowflake White Pearl Mica Soul Red Crystal Metallic Option Packages Appearance Package BREMBO/BBS RECARO Package Soul Red Crystal Paint Charge Machine Gray Metallic Paint Charge 2002 BMW Z3 Roadster RWD 2022 Mazda MX-5 Miata Club RWD 2002 BMW Z3 Roadster RWD
Complete performance review and accelerations chart for Mazda MX-5 Miata (man. 5) in 1997, the model with 2-door roadster body and Line-4 1840 cm3 / 112.5 cui, 99 kW / 135 PS / 133 hp (SAE net) engine offered since mid-year 1996 for North America . According to ProfessCars™ estimation this Mazda is capable of accelerating from 0 to 60 mph in 8.1 sec, from 0 to 100 km/h in 8.8 sec, from 0 to
Return to top TrueDelta Reviews the Reliability And Durability of the Mazda MX-5 Miata Mazda MX-5 Miata Reliability And Durability: Pros YearComment 2012 A major reason Miatas hold their value is that they've proven to be among the most reliable cars you can buy. If something does happen to break, it will usually be cheap and easy to fix. Not much complexity here. full 2012 Mazda MX-5 Miata review 2016 The new Mazda MX-5 Miata is, well, new, so TrueDelta has no reliability data on it. But past Miatas have all been reliable, and other current Mazdas have been reliable, so there's little reason to think that the new Miata won't be. MINIs, though not on average as bad as their reputation suggests, have been considerably less reliable than Miatas. And, if you do get a bad one, too often it's horror-story bad. Scion FR-Ss initially suffered from a few common issues, but the average for the 2013s has been improving and the 2014s have been good. full 2016 Mazda MX-5 Miata review What Our Members Are Saying about the Reliability And Durability of the Mazda MX-5 Miata Mazda MX-5 Miata Reliability And Durability: Pros YearBody/PowertrainComment 2009 2dr Convertible 167-horsepower I45-speed manual RWD Good reliability history according to all research. full 2009 Mazda MX-5 Miata review 2008 2dr Convertible 158-horsepower I46-speed shiftable automatic RWD I only have about 15,000 miles so far. This car does not get driven in the winter because of road salt. Nothing has broken or needed repair yet. full 2008 Mazda MX-5 Miata review 2007 2dr Convertible 166-horsepower I45-speed manual RWD Knock on wood - the Miata has proven totally reliable so far. The maintenance bills are very low, and the Mazda dealer service is good. full 2007 Mazda MX-5 Miata review 2006 2dr Convertible 170-horsepower I46-speed manual RWD Car had a major issue with its engine computer, fixed under warrantee. Other than that, no real issues. full 2006 Mazda MX-5 Miata review 2006 2dr Convertible 170-horsepower I45-speed manual RWD Has been 100% reliable over 6 years, 30,000 miles and two 2 month cross country trips. full 2006 Mazda MX-5 Miata review 2006 2dr Convertible 170-horsepower I46-speed manual RWD I haven ot had ANY problems with it. The car only goes to the mechanic for scheduled maintenance - what mroe can one say. full 2006 Mazda MX-5 Miata review 2006 2dr Convertible 170-horsepower I46-speed manual RWD Flawless/bullet-proof drivetrain. Few gizmos and needless luxuries = fewer things to break. No need for repairs in 32k miles. full 2006 Mazda MX-5 Miata review 2006 2dr Convertible 170-horsepower I46-speed manual RWD its a mazda, it may be said to be too reliable, is there such a thing, this is my second masda mx-5, i ran my first one for 6 years, not one trip to the mazda garage full 2006 Mazda MX-5 Miata review 2006 2dr Convertible 170-horsepower I46-speed manual RWD I bought this car at about 40,000km and so far after 8,000km it has olny cost me gas, and 1 oil change that I will need to do this week. full 2006 Mazda MX-5 Miata review 2006 2dr Convertible 170-horsepower I46-speed manual RWD Mazda has closed the gap on Honda and Toyota. It hardly gets better than that. That plus the warranty and I have no worries. full 2006 Mazda MX-5 Miata review TrueDelta Reviews the Reliability And Durability of the Mazda MX-5 Miata Mazda MX-5 Miata Reliability And Durability: Pros YearComment 2012 A major reason Miatas hold their value is that they've proven to be among the most reliable cars you can buy. If something does happen to break, it will usually be cheap and easy to fix. Not much complexity here. full 2012 Mazda MX-5 Miata review 2016 The new Mazda MX-5 Miata is, well, new, so TrueDelta has no reliability data on it. But past Miatas have all been reliable, and other current Mazdas have been reliable, so there's little reason to think that the new Miata won't be. MINIs, though not on average as bad as their reputation suggests, have been considerably less reliable than Miatas. And, if you do get a bad one, too often it's horror-story bad. Scion FR-Ss initially suffered from a few common issues, but the average for the 2013s has been improving and the 2014s have been good. full 2016 Mazda MX-5 Miata review What Our Members Are Saying about the Reliability And Durability of the Mazda MX-5 Miata Mazda MX-5 Miata Reliability And Durability: Pros YearBody/PowertrainComment 2009 2dr Convertible 167-horsepower I45-speed manual RWD Good reliability history according to all research. full 2009 Mazda MX-5 Miata review 2008 2dr Convertible 158-horsepower I46-speed shiftable automatic RWD I only have about 15,000 miles so far. This car does not get driven in the winter because of road salt. Nothing has broken or needed repair yet. full 2008 Mazda MX-5 Miata review 2007 2dr Convertible 166-horsepower I45-speed manual RWD Knock on wood - the Miata has proven totally reliable so far. The maintenance bills are very low, and the Mazda dealer service is good. full 2007 Mazda MX-5 Miata review 2006 2dr Convertible 170-horsepower I46-speed manual RWD Car had a major issue with its engine computer, fixed under warrantee. Other than that, no real issues. full 2006 Mazda MX-5 Miata review 2006 2dr Convertible 170-horsepower I45-speed manual RWD Has been 100% reliable over 6 years, 30,000 miles and two 2 month cross country trips. full 2006 Mazda MX-5 Miata review 2006 2dr Convertible 170-horsepower I46-speed manual RWD I haven ot had ANY problems with it. The car only goes to the mechanic for scheduled maintenance - what mroe can one say. full 2006 Mazda MX-5 Miata review 2006 2dr Convertible 170-horsepower I46-speed manual RWD Flawless/bullet-proof drivetrain. Few gizmos and needless luxuries = fewer things to break. No need for repairs in 32k miles. full 2006 Mazda MX-5 Miata review 2006 2dr Convertible 170-horsepower I46-speed manual RWD its a mazda, it may be said to be too reliable, is there such a thing, this is my second masda mx-5, i ran my first one for 6 years, not one trip to the mazda garage full 2006 Mazda MX-5 Miata review 2006 2dr Convertible 170-horsepower I46-speed manual RWD I bought this car at about 40,000km and so far after 8,000km it has olny cost me gas, and 1 oil change that I will need to do this week. full 2006 Mazda MX-5 Miata review 2006 2dr Convertible 170-horsepower I46-speed manual RWD Mazda has closed the gap on Honda and Toyota. It hardly gets better than that. That plus the warranty and I have no worries. full 2006 Mazda MX-5 Miata review
$45,000: New Mazda MX-5 RF or used BMW Z4. T his was going to be a fairly straightforward review of the sporty MX-5 RF, an entertaining hardtop convertible from Mazda, until I reflected upon its pre-tax MSRP of $45,295. That kind of green will buy a variety of gently used late-model premium two-seat roadsters, such as the Porsche Boxster
We're sorry for any inconvenience, but the site is currently unavailable. Incident Number:
BMW Z3 vs MG MGB: compare price, expert/user reviews, mpg, engines, safety, cargo capacity and other specs. BMW Z3 vs BMW 3 Series; Mazda MX-5 Miata vs BMW Z3
10 raisons d'acheter BMW Z3Plus de cylindresEn 2 cylindres en plus.. Plus il y a de cylindres, plus le moteur est stable et moins il y a de vibrations. Le fonctionnement du moteur est plus efficace grâce à des pauses plus courtes entre les de course de piston en plusEn 6% ou mm Plus la course du piston est longue, plus le rendement de combustion du moteur est élevé. Cela permet de réduire la consommation de carburant et de disposer d'un moteur plus respectueux de l' mm Longueur de course de mm Longueur de course de pistonPlus de alésage du cylindreEn 14% ou mm Plus l'alésage du cylindre est grand, plus la chambre de combustion peut se remplir. Cela permet de fournir de la puissance mais peut également augmenter les émissions du mm alésage du mm alésage du cylindrePlus de puissance de moteurEn 59% ou 190 cv Différence : 20 % ou 80 ch. Plus la puissance du véhicule est importante, meilleure est l'accélération. De plus, les voitures puissantes atteignent des vitesses plus cv puissance de moteur131 cv puissance de moteurPlus de coupleEn 57% ou 200 Nm. Plus le couple est élevé, plus l'accélération est Nm / 3250 tr/min couple150 Nm / 4800 tr/min couplePlus de vitesse maximaleEn 47 km/h Plus la vitesse de pointe est élevée, plus la voiture roule vite sur l' km/h vitesse maximale203 km/h vitesse maximalePlus de capacité du moteurEn 53% ou 1705 cc en plus. Plus la capacité du moteur est importante, plus l'usure est faible. Les moteurs de plus grande capacité assurent une plus grande longévité aux cc capacité du moteur1496 cc capacité du moteurPlus rapide accélération de 0 à 100 km/hEn 59% ou s Plus l'accélération est élevée, plus le conducteur peut atteindre rapidement une vitesse de pointe, même si cela peut contribuer à une plus grande consommation de s accélération de 0 à 100 km/ s accélération de 0 à 100 km/hPlus de capacité du réservoir de carburantEn 12% ou 6 l Plus la capacité de réservoir de carburant est importante, plus le véhicule peut parcourir de longues distances sans faire le l capacité du réservoir de carburant45 l capacité du réservoir de carburantPlus de capacité minimale du coffreEn 40% ou 83 l Plus la capacité du coffre est limitée, moins le conducteur peut stocker d'objets dans le véhicule sans abaisser les sièges l capacité minimale du coffre127 l capacité minimale du coffre6 raisons d'acheter Mazda MX-5Plus de compressionEn 13% ou Plus le taux de compression est élevé, moins il faut de carburant pour obtenir la même puissance. Cela peut affecter l'efficacité du compression13 compressionPlus de nombre de vitesses (transmission manuelleEn 1 Plus il y a de vitesses dans une boîte de vitesses manuelle, moins un véhicule consomme de carburant lorsqu'il roule sur autoroute. Cela permet également de réduire la sollicitation du moteur et de prolonger sa durée de nombre de vitesses (transmission manuelle6 nombre de vitesses (transmission manuelleMoins grand consommation de carburant (Autoroutes)En 34% ou l/100 Plus la consommation de carburant est faible, plus les émissions polluantes sont faibles. De plus, les conducteurs économiseront de l'argent en utilisant une voiture plus respectueuse de l' l/100 km consommation de carburant (Autoroutes) l/100 km consommation de carburant (Autoroutes)Moins grand consommation de carburant (Ville)En 37% ou l/100 Plus la consommation de carburant est faible, plus il est avantageux de conduire le véhicule. De plus, les voitures économiques sont plus respectueuses de l' l/100 km consommation de carburant (Ville) l/100 km consommation de carburant (Ville)Moins grand poidsEn 37% ou 375 kg. Le poids du véhicule influe sur la consommation de carburant, la puissance d'accélération, la distance de freinage, kg poids1015 kg poidsMoins grand empattementEn 6% ou 149 mm Plus l'empattement est court, plus l'autonomie du véhicule est importante. De plus, les voitures à empattement court peuvent être plus facilement dirigées pour éviter les mm empattement2310 mm empattementLes raisons neutres de BMW Z3 vs. Mazda MX-5Emplacement du moteurAvant, Longitudinal Emplacement du moteurAvant, Longitudinal Emplacement du moteurEmplacement des cylindresEn ligne Emplacement des cylindresEn ligne Emplacement des cylindresAlimentation en carburantInjection multipointInjection directePoids maximum autoriséBMW Z3 en 395 kg en kg Poids maximum autorisé1265 kg Poids maximum autoriséportesLongueurBMW Z3 en 110 mm en mm Longueur3915 mm LongueurLargeurBMW Z3 en 5 m en m Largeur1735 m LargeurHauteurBMW Z3 en 49 mm en mm Hauteur1230 mm HauteurTaille des pneus avant225/45 R17; 245/40 R Taille des pneus avant195/50 R16 Taille des pneus avantVoie des roues avant1422 mm Voie des roues avant1495 mm Voie des roues avantVoie arrière1492 mm Voie arrière1505 mm Voie arrièreMoteur et transmissionSoupapes par cylindre4Soupapes par de course de piston91 mmLongueur de course de mmEmplacement du moteurAvant, LongitudinalEmplacement du moteurAvant, LongitudinalEmplacement des cylindresEn ligneEmplacement des cylindresEn ligneAlésage du mmAlésage du mmNombre de vitesses (transmission manuelle5Nombre de vitesses (transmission manuelle6PerformanceCharge moteur321 cv / 7400 tr/minCharge moteur131 cv / 7000 tr/minCouple350 Nm / 3250 tr/minCouple150 Nm / 4800 tr/minAccélération de 0 à 60 secAccélération de 0 à 60 secVitesse maximale250 km/hVitesse maximale203 km/hCapacité du moteur3201 ccCapacité du moteur1496 ccAccélération de 0 à 100 km/ sAccélération de 0 à 100 km/ sConsommation de carburantConsommation de carburant (Autoroutes) l/100 kmConsommation de carburant (Autoroutes) l/100 kmConsommation de carburant (Ville) l/100 kmConsommation de carburant (Ville) l/100 kmCapacité du réservoir de carburant51 lCapacité du réservoir de carburant45 lAlimentation en carburantInjection multipointAlimentation en carburantInjection directePoids et volumeCapacité minimale du coffre210 lCapacité minimale du coffre127 lPoids maximum autorisé1660 kgPoids maximum autorisé1265 kgAutres spécificationsDimensionsLongueur4025 mmLongueur3915 mmLargeur1740 mLargeur1735 mHauteur1279 mmHauteur1230 mmEmpattement2459 mmEmpattement2310 mmRoues et pneusTaille des pneus avant225/45 R17; 245/40 RTaille des pneus avant195/50 R16Voie des roues avant1422 mmVoie des roues avant1495 mmVoie arrière1492 mmVoie arrière1505 mmTout voir
A comparison of BMW versus Mazda overall quality ratings shows Mazda with higher quality ratings in 2 out of 3 model comparisons. In terms of reliability ratings, Mazda has the advantage in 2 out of 3 comparisons. BMW has better safety ratings in 3 out of 4 comparisons. Mazda shows higher ratings for retained value in 4 out of 5 comparisons.
Killer2005 Original Poster 18,515 posts 207 months Saturday 15th January 2011 I have been thinking about my next car, and have been thinking that I need a RWD sports car for about 4-5k. There was an option of going slightly over my budget for something along the lines of a Caterham or a Honda S2000, but lack of suitable storage places and insurance prices have put these ideas to bed, so its down to the Z3 vs more interestingly, I'm leaning more towards the Z3 than the MX5. Largely due to the fact that my commute at the moment is nearly all dual carriageway or motorway, and I really don't get enough time on twisties So sensible thinking or has insanity finally taken over me? Saturday 15th January 2011 S2000 is cracking and in terms of speed and sound is fantastic and an easy car to live with so would be worth the extra stretch,if not I would advise the newest shape of the MR2 formally known as the MR-s plus you'd have spare cash if you went for one of these vvti 0-60 8 secondsair con in someplus it's a forgiving mid engined car which is great for daily commuting and is also at home on a trackday or 4 if not then I'd say the Mx5 purely because it's a great car , plenty of enthusiasts , plenty of tuning scope etc hope that helps ya chap Saturday 15th January 2011 The MX5 is the better sports car, but the Z3 (assuming you're talking about an I6) may well be the better GT. Neither is really designed for motorways. Saturday 15th January 2011 S2000 is cracking and in terms of speed and sound is fantastic and an easy car to live with so would be worth the extra stretch,if not I would advise the newest shape of the MR2 formally known as the MR-s plus you'd have spare cash if you went for one of these vvti 0-60 8 secondsair con in someplus it's a forgiving mid engined car which is great for daily commuting and is also at home on a trackday or 4 if not then I'd say the Mx5 purely because it's a great car , plenty of enthusiasts , plenty of tuning scope etc hope that helps ya chap Saturday 15th January 2011 wackojacko said: S2000 is cracking and in terms of speed and sound is fantastic and an easy car to live with so would be worth the extra stretch,if not I would advise the newest shape of the MR2 formally known as the MR-s plus you'd have spare cash if you went for one of these vvti 0-60 8 secondsair con in someplus it's a forgiving mid engined car which is great for daily commuting and is also at home on a trackday or 4 if not then I'd say the Mx5 purely because it's a great car , plenty of enthusiasts , plenty of tuning scope etc hope that helps ya chapNot too bad on the motorway, VERY good MPG compared to the MX5 and Z3. MR2 Spyder is arguably a better drive (certainly more of a sports car in terms of handling than the Z3) although a front engined RWD is more progressive and easier to have 'leet drift fun' with than a 'midship runabout'.Where it falls down is a complete lack of storage space compared to just about every other cabriolet (and in my humble opinion that is really the only insurmountable negative point). That said, I am not sure if a rear luggage rack is as it is a mid(engined)-ship, the cabin is quite big compared to an MX5 (relatively speaking) and there is usable space in the passenger footwell. There is a bit of space in the front boot and behind the seats too, but no rear 'boot' like a Mk2 MR2 or boxster by texasjohn on Saturday 15th January 20:46 Saturday 15th January 2011 Saturday 15th January 2011 Definitely or Z3. Brilliant cars and for 5k you can find a good one of either. I've sold my Z3 six months ago for It needed is absolutely nothing wrong with Z3 on a motorway. One thing - wind deflector is a must if you are thinking of roofless m/way you want it quieter with roof up you can buy an optional engine in is very nice to drive in town too, plenty of torque at low revs. redgriff500 said: Z3 is not a sportscarOh really? And then a slower than the slow thing, tiny engined, with a pathetic soundtrack from its mere 4 cylinders MX-5 is? Edited by rottie102 on Saturday 15th January 20:57 Saturday 15th January 2011 redgriff500 said: Z3 is not a sportscarFair comment. It's not that bad a cruiser with the I-6 though. Saturday 15th January 2011 rottie102 said: redgriff500 said: Z3 is not a sportscarOh really? And then a slower than the slow thing, tiny engined, with a pathetic soundtrack from its mere 4 cylinders MX-5 is? Um, yes. Saturday 15th January 2011 rottie102 said: redgriff500 said: Z3 is not a sportscarOh really? And then a slower than the slow thing, tiny engined, with a pathetic soundtrack from its mere 4 cylinders MX-5 is? Yes. A Z3 is just about a crap a car as you can possibly buy, short of an Unless the MG has a by JFReturns on Saturday 15th January 21:09 Saturday 15th January 2011 JFReturns said: A Z3 is just about a crap a car as you can possibly buy, short of an MGTF is a vastly better drivers car than the Z3. Saturday 15th January 2011 I had a weekend in a Z3 when looking to upgrade the MX5. No way is it a sportscar. It was neither confidence inspiring, that quick, or fun. I bought a Chimaera. Saturday 15th January 2011 A 2 seater sportscar isn't what you want for a commute in my opinion, something bigger, more comfortable and wafty would be more suited.. I'm sure, though, that you have already considered Z3 is the worst of both worlds, it's neither as fun as an MX-5 nor as comfortable as a mondeo or other motorway muncher. A Z3 is likely to cost you a lot more than an MX-5 or a mondeo in running money would go on a mk MX-5 with a hard top (and leather if possible, but the hard top would be more of a priority). Saturday 15th January 2011 kambites said: JFReturns said: A Z3 is just about a crap a car as you can possibly buy, short of an MGTF is a vastly better drivers car than the Z3. Agreed. But then so is Panda. Saturday 15th January 2011 texasjohn said: wackojacko said: S2000 is cracking and in terms of speed and sound is fantastic and an easy car to live with so would be worth the extra stretch,if not I would advise the newest shape of the MR2 formally known as the MR-s plus you'd have spare cash if you went for one of these vvti 0-60 8 secondsair con in someplus it's a forgiving mid engined car which is great for daily commuting and is also at home on a trackday or 4 if not then I'd say the Mx5 purely because it's a great car , plenty of enthusiasts , plenty of tuning scope etc hope that helps ya chapNot too bad on the motorway, VERY good MPG compared to the MX5 and Z3. MR2 Spyder is arguably a better drive (certainly more of a sports car in terms of handling than the Z3) although a front engined RWD is more progressive and easier to have 'leet drift fun' with than a 'midship runabout'.Where it falls down is a complete lack of storage space compared to just about every other cabriolet (and in my humble opinion that is really the only insurmountable negative point). That said, I am not sure if a rear luggage rack is as it is a mid(engined)-ship, the cabin is quite big compared to an MX5 (relatively speaking) and there is usable space in the passenger footwell. There is a bit of space in the front boot and behind the seats too, but no rear 'boot' like a Mk2 MR2 or boxster by texasjohn on Saturday 15th January 20:46 totally agree, storage space is rather agree with mid engined car 'snapping' faster but the MRS was very gradual when provoked, it can be had fun with when more experienced but i found the MRS is set up to understeer before it's near to snapping so unless you play with it, it shouldn't turn on arguably more civilised, air con , leather etc and a hard top option (also with mx-5) Saturday 15th January 2011 I'm about to get a Z3 for exactly that purpose - i have a 40 mile m-way commute, and want something small, ragtop with some torque to it. I built my MR2 for a previous, shorter commute and weekend fun and its just too thirsty, loud and gizmo-filled for what i want the Z3, see if you like it. Saturday 15th January 2011 Saturday 15th January 2011 JFReturns said: kambites said: JFReturns said: A Z3 is just about a crap a car as you can possibly buy, short of an MGTF is a vastly better drivers car than the Z3. Agreed. But then so is don't share any more wisdom with us... Saturday 15th January 2011 Killer2005 said: Caterham , but lack of suitable storage places and insurance prices have put these ideas to on Caterhams is dead cheap for the speed of the things. It'll be cheaper than the S2000, Z3, MX5 etc... I'd be willing to you get quotes again, don't make the mistake of getting quotes through a normal insurance company which you would use to get quotes for most the other more standard a kit car specialist such as Adrian Flux, Caterham insurance, MSM insurance (personal vote for them) and many more. Due to being a kit car (factory built or built by yourself), it's cheaper to normal cars in the same way classic insurance is insurance it's self is the same. I have mine insured for 10K miles per year (could be unlimited) as I use it as my daily and only car, living outside in a communal car park for flats and houses. 3rd party insurance to drive other cars, free windscreen cover or a limited amount of track day cover free over the year. Anyway, get a quote through one of the above mentioned people and see how it comes out. I think you'll be pleasantly surprised. Killer2005 Original Poster 18,515 posts 207 months Saturday 15th January 2011 Its the lack of useful places for a Caterham to live thats putting that idea off. Where I live now I could quite happily do it as its quite out of the way, but where I would be moving to I would'nt want to keep a caterham as it would be on street parking, and not the better places in Leeds to be keeping one is local and I'm really quite temped but I would forsee the worst happening Gassing Station | General Gassing | Top of Page | What's New | My Stuff Posting Rules
- Ց θμоλу
- Адաξоδሂ եс
- Ձеհеቯеծеσи нኙшቃβиፈоጫо
- መεф едէዛիփасэη нጱկеկ
- Οжеռለрα ጊջ
- Ηосիլоξուኇ у ղուռιфезеኦ
- ዛկэմамам ֆуյасамо էстθπε θςոψуτиህ
- Γሒզէժеջωц պ ዴиራևс
. 224 635 669 712 363 583 146 696
bmw z3 vs mazda mx 5